Author Archives: Patrick

Attending MIX this week in Las Vegas

I’m attending one of my favorite conferences this week – MIX: http://visitmix.com. MIX is Microsoft’s conference for “designers, developers, and web builders”

MIX11_BB_SeeYouAt_1

Much of the content will be recorded and streamed at http://live.visitmix.com, so I’m focusing on people instead of content this week. I’m especially focused on people using Windows Azure and Windows Phone who are based in the Central Region of the US (since that’s my area). If you live in one of these states and you’d like a Microsoft contact for Windows Azure or Windows Phone development, PLEASE reach out to me at Patrick.Foley@microsoft.com or @patrickfoley. Even if you don’t live in my region – if you’re reading this from MIX, please reach out.

central_map

Presentation for PartnerPoint

Today, I’m delivering a presentation on understanding the cloud and Windows Azure for PartnerPoint members. The video and deck will be made available at a later date, but the key resources I discuss can be found on my Windows Azure Resources page (I will keep that page up-to-date).

Since I work with partners, I like mentioning specific partners I’ve work with whenever possible. Here are a few interesting ones I mention today:

www.savogroup.com

www.nasuni.com

www.doubletake.com

www.impirus.com

www.vignature.com

Lots of firsts today

I rode in my first road bicycle race today (I had previously ridden one cyclocross race), the Fisk Knob Time Trial. My friends at Atomic Object included me on their team, and I had a blast! I was carrying 17 extra pounds (157 actual vs 140 ideal) and wasn’t in the best of shape, but I had a ton of fun, and I can’t wait to get back on the bike for more.

Today was the first time I got on a bike this year. Smile I will train better next time. Today was also the first time ever that I

  • Rode in sub freezing temperatures
  • Rode a time trial (or had someone hold the back of my bike while I started) – so I set a Personal Record 1:10:10 for 17.29 miles
  • Rode for an hour without unclipping or even stopping pedaling
  • Rode a bike alone for more than 10 minutes. Seriously – I’ve always done group rides. I REALLY liked riding alone and need to do more of it.
  • Climbed the biggest hill in Kent County (elevation course map)

I’m sure there were more … most importantly, it was a lot of fun. I should have taken pictures, because I looked ridiculous – I had to combine a lot of different colored items to gear up for the cold.

Firsts are good – especially if they are followed by seconds and thirds. What firsts have you had lately?

Try not. Run an experiment instead.

Lately I’ve been struggling with Yoda’s immortal words, “Do or do not … there is no try.” So many startup/tech writers have referenced that quote: Jason Baptiste37 Signals … half the people on twitter. Brad Feld even wears an uber-nerdy version of it on a t-shirt.

I think Yoda’s trying to tell me not to give myself permission to fail, but I don’t think I do that much. I have a bigger problem restricting myself only to activities where I know I’ll succeed. An aversion to risk aversion even led Seth Godin to question Yoda’s wisdom in Poke the Box. There is something about trying that’s important; it moves us forward.

Maybe Ash Maurya has figured out the riddle. After reading Running Lean and talking with Ash recently, I started to realize that everything Ash does is an experiment. He doesn’t say, “I’m trying to start xyz” – instead he says, “I’m running an experiment to find out something about xyz.” In his businesses, in his blog, in his book, even talking on the phone, Ash really appears to think and act that way. Oh … and Ash channels Yoda, too.

This is changing the way I think about change. An experiment is not a “try” – it’s a “do.” Running an experiment is an affirmative action. The result may or may not be what I wanted or expected. Doesn’t matter. What matters is that I did it, that I ran the experiment and gathered information about the world as it really is.

I recently noticed that eating better makes me feel better. I could get caught up in thinking “I will try to eat better” (or even worse, “I should eat better”) … or I could just eat better, as Yoda would undoubtedly suggest. But “just do it” sometimes leads to a distracting battle of will with myself, so instead of testing my willpower, I’m looking at my diet as a long-running experiment. What happens when I eat a grapefruit as a midafternoon snack instead of chocolate? Does a single beer at night really affect the way I feel in the morning (dammit)? Drinking water instead of soda at lunch feels less like giving up something and more like “doing” when I think about it as an experiment.

How about my career? There are lots of things I want to do that I haven’t done. Write more. Present more. Create a “MicroISV” like Patrick McKenzie or Rob Walling. Have a big impact within Microsoft. All of these “goals” are too vague to act on. So I’m starting to ask, “What experiments can I make to move forward, to help me learn something about these points on the horizon I seem drawn to?”

Take writing – at the beginning of the year, I told myself I would (should) write every day. I have not. For a while, I thought it was merely a matter of will or time management, but I know that’s not it. It’s fear – fear of finding out that I’m not a good writer. Who cares? If what I write sucks, then nobody will read it. Simple as that. Nobody will be hurt in the process, and I will find out something. I may even get better.

I’m consistently reminded about a story I heard on NPR a few years ago about Quantity vs. Quality from the book Life is a Verb:

A college ceramics teacher decided to do an experiment with his two fall pottery classes. He told one class they would be graded solely on the quantity of work they produced that quarter and their grade depended on the number of pots they threw — so the more the better! The second class was told their grade would be determined by the quality of their work and they only needed to produce one “perfect” pot.

Who did better work? The better quality pieces came from the class that was graded on quantity! As they were making all those pots, they couldn’t help but get better at it. They were doing, not thinking or trying. People are naturally curious. I suspect that each pot a student made became a little experiment in pot-making, whether they knew it or not.

I do a podcast with Bob Walsh. We just published our 103rd show. A hundred and three! And I still think it’s no good … thank goodness Bob keeps pushing us forward. If I did the show on my own, I probably would have 3 shows done. Every time we publish, all I can think about is what’s wrong with it or what needs to be better. Yet we have more than a thousand subscribers, and people I really respect tell me they listen to it and get value from it. Yes, there is still work to be done, but maybe it’s time to stop worrying about being a good podcaster and start looking at each show as an opportunity to run an experiment in podcasting. We can’t help but get better if we give our best, evaluate honestly, and keep doing it.

Isn’t play just a series of experiments? Kids don’t think about it, but they’re running experiments constantly. What happens when I poke this box … or when I stomp in this puddle? I’ve never considered myself a particularly playful person. Maybe being more experimental will induce some playfulness.

Heck, it even applies to romance. I’ll never forget a conversation I had with a friend way back in college:

Bryan: Foley, how many times have you ever been slapped?
Me: I’ve never been slapped!
Bryan: Well, then you’re doing something wrong …

I never understood what he meant, but I think I’m beginning to. Turns out that women don’t generally like pigs, but they don’t usually like men to ask for a permission slip, either. A little experimentation with your partner or potential partner can take you a long way. Of course it can get you slapped, apparently, but the point is … you have to be willing to take some risks.

Tomorrow I’m running a dubious experiment. I’m going to find out what riding a time trial with zero training does to my body. It’s dubious because there is a large body of evidence from other riders pointing out what will likely happen. It would be a more interesting experiment to find out how training effects my personal performance. Instead of getting mad at myself for what I haven’t done yet, I’m just going to have some fun in the saddle and watch the experiment unfold.

As Yoda says, “Try not! Do or do not … there is no try.” When you find yourself merely trying, consider running an experiment instead.

Watch the winning Lightning Talk from Business of Software 2010

As I mentioned in previous posts, delivering a Lightning Talk at the Business of Software conference was an amazing experience for me. It appeared to make a big impact on my peers who delivered talks as well.

At least that’s what Patrick McKenzie says … his winning talk is now up … take 7.5 minutes and just watch it. It’s great – very funny, and you’ll learn something, too.

Patrick is a hero of mine. Ever since I moved away from being a musician to being a professional nerd, I’ve wanted to make a technology business I could call mine AND fit into a balanced lifestyle AND do things MY way. For various reasons, I haven’t succeeded with all of that yet. Patrick has succeeded – and he’s left a trail of breadcrumbs for people like me who want to learn from his experiences.

On top of that, he’s just a really nice guy. Go watch his video now!

patrickmPatrick having fun with his talk (photo by Betsy Weber)

Get started on Windows Azure today with the Windows Azure 30-day pass!

If you want to give Windows Azure a spin without having to provide a credit card, go to this link and enter your country and the promo code PFOLEY. This is a great way to experiment and prototype, but after 30 days, all your deployments and data will be erased, so make sure you don’t put anything into production using this pass.

Questions? Leave a comment or send me an email.

Some companies are hiring

I went to lunch with a friend yesterday who told me that his company is turning away business because they can’t hire software developers fast enough. If you live in the Grand Rapids area and are looking for a software development job, send me an email to Patrick.Foley@microsoft.com and I’ll make an introduction. SharePoint developers are in particularly high demand.

Article published

My first article with MSDN Magazine has just been published: Use Multiple Visual Studio Project Types for Cloud Success.

This was a fun and interesting challenge for me. I hope to write more articles like this in the future. I welcome your feedback here or at Patrick.Foley@microsoft.com.

I’m in the process of uploading a set of companion pages that give really detailed step-by-step screenshots – my blog might have some funky links for the next couple of hours until I’m done.

Are you a developer looking for an idea?

There is a wonderful incubator, Momentum, based in my home town of Grand Rapids, MI, that encourages software developers to join the program, even if they don’t have a specific business idea to pursue. At least in our market, there are more ideas than developers, so this is a way to help match match entrepreneurial developers  with founders needing their talents.

If you are based in Grand Rapids, you might even be able to participate in the 12-week program without quitting your day job. Even if you are not based in Grand Rapids, it could well be worth it for you to take a sabbatical. I sat in on some of the sessions last year, and I learned a lot. The education provided by Momentum is very valuable.

If you are a developer looking to join a startup, sign up at http://momentum-mi.com/apply/single-developer/. If Grand Rapids isn’t your thing, be on the lookout for similar programs from other incubators. It makes so much sense that I suspect more and more incubators will do it.

REIT/RENT … a “meshy” idea that would be really hard to pull off

In our last podcast, Bob and I interviewed Lisa Gansky, author of The Mesh and founder of http://meshing.it/.

The idea behind “the mesh” is that businesses are challenging traditional models of ownership in new and profitable ways. Think Netflix or ZipCar or even Groupon.

During our conversation with Lisa, I remembered a “meshy” idea I came up with a long time ago – one that requires extensive domain knowledge about real estate that I don’t have …

Why is it that our only options for home ownership ultimately come down to own or rent? Why can’t we find a middle ground between these two options? Owning your own home has traditionally been part of the American Dream, and for many, owning your home is a fine investment. However, some financial advisors are challenging the conventional wisdom about home ownership, especially after the recent housing crisis. Is it really sound to have the vast majority of your personal wealth tied up in a single investment? And that investment turned out to me more volatile than everyone assumed.

I’d like the option of having a looser connection between the home I occupy and my real estate investment. Essentially, I would like the option to invest in a real estate investment trust (REIT) that agreed to purchase my house and rent it back to me. Assuming all the legal and managerial details could be worked out, this would give me many of the advantages of home ownership and eliminate many of the disadvantages. I would have the universe of “for sale” homes available to me, and I would have the pride of ownership associated with calling my home “mine.” However, the investment vehicle could be set up in such a way that I would not be subject to the same liquidity issues associated with traditional home ownership – I could move more easily without being stuck with a house (there should still be financial consequences to this, but they would not be so severe). Also, if I wanted to move back to San Francisco to be near a good baseball team, I could live in a “modest” $500,000 house but invest a smaller amount toward my ownership of that house – an amount that was more appropriate to my personal financial situation.

Note that I’d still have to pay appropriate rent, management fees, etc. based on the actual cost of the house, so this wouldn’t be a golden ticket to live beyond my means. In fact, it would have the opposite effect. During the housing crisis, many people gambled on jumbo mortgages under the assumption that housing prices would continue to go up and they’d get to cash in on a high-leverage investment. This worked for many people, but when the bottom fell out of the housing market, it devastated our economy and many families’ lives. A combination REIT/RENT living arrangement would force you to acknowledge how much you are paying for your current accommodations while spreading the investment risk across hundreds or thousands of homes, presumably across multiple communities and regions.

Here’s an example, heavy on arm-waving (remember, this is squarely outside my area of expertise): if I buy a home with “no money down” resulting in a mortgage that demands a $1,000 payment each month, I’m only “investing” a tiny amount of principal each month (most of my payment goes to interest at first). On a thirty-year fixed note, my equity – my actual investment – is going to be close to zero for several years. If I decide to move after five years – barring a distinct jump in my home’s value – I will be lucky to break even, and I might even lose money (since it costs 3-6% in fees to sell a home). If I really wanted to treat that home as an investment (especially if I don’t intend to live in it for thirty years), I would need to pay more than the minimum payment each month, let’s say an additional $100/month toward principal. If I did so, then after five years, I’d at least have $6,000 (plus or minus the fluctuation in the value of my home) – this would probably cover my fees if I sold the house, assuming it didn’t fluctuate much in value.

Now imagine a business existed that could buy that same home for me and rent it back to me for $1,000/month (more likely it would have to be $1,200/month or more to account for managerial fees and my greatly reduced exposure to real estate market risk). In addition, in order to “use” this service, I’d have to invest in it – let’s say another $100/month. After five years, I’d have a $6,000 investment in the REIT, plus or minus the fluctuation of the value of all the homes in the REIT. If I wanted to move, I’d have to pay some sort of service fee, but it wouldn’t necessarily wipe out my investment, and it would be a heck of a lot more convenient than having to sell my home. It’s like a 100% timeshare on my home.

The “co-op” nature of this is key to making it work … plenty of REITs exist already, but I don’t know of any that take advantage of the magic that happens when people feel ownership for their dwelling (i.e., they tend not to trash it). In fact, this idea came to me about 15 years ago when I moved into a really nice apartment complex in Las Colinas (outside of Dallas, TX). It was so nice that I wanted to own part of it, so I looked into investing in the company that managed the complex. It was too much of a hassle, so I abandoned the idea, but I couldn’t help but think that such a nice place should encourage its residents to invest in it. Everybody wins – the ownership company would get more capital (presumably at a premium) and residents would get to participate as owners in their community.

There is probably a good reason nobody’s done this, but our conversation with Lisa reminded me of this idea and convinced me that it’s worth challenging assumptions about ownership. I don’t know if this one is a good idea – but it’s certainly meshy! It’s also an idea I have no desire to pursue and no background knowledge to make work. Maybe it will inspire a meshy idea that works for you.